Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: net: wireless: add flag marvell,ignore-regulatory-hint

On 20/08/2026 08:42, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2026 at 8:27 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 19/08/2026 13:42, George Valkov wrote:
>>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2026 at 12:42, Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 12:54:26AM +0300, Georgi Valkov wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/marvell,sd8787.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/marvell,sd8787.yaml
>>>>> index 930b700b73d0..5f235cb9f3e5 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/marvell,sd8787.yaml
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/marvell,sd8787.yaml
>>>>> @@ -59,6 +59,12 @@ properties:
>>>>>      description: Calibration data for sub-band 3 in the 5GHz band.
>>>>>      maxItems: 502
>>>>>
>>>>> +  marvell,ignore-regulatory-hint:
>>>>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
>>>>> +    description:
>>>>> +      Ignore an incorrect regulatory hint from ROM,
>>>>> +      so userspace can set the correct regulatory domain.
>>>>> +
>>>>
>>>> Same comments, so you just ignored entire feedback?
>>>
>>> Do you mean this feedback? I already replied to it:
>>>>> Anyway, property looks like SW choice. You must describe hardware
>>>>> instead.
>>>>
>>>> I am sorry, I do not understand what you want me to do?
>>>> Can you please send a diff or a clear description suitable for people
>>>> who have way less experience than you?
>>>
>>>
>>>> Again: you need to describe the hardware, in commit msg, in property
>>>> name and in description. You cannot tell SW what to do, that's not the
>>>> purpose of bindings.
>>>
>>> I still don't understand what I should do?
>>> Can you please show me an example of the changes you want?
>>> Else I'm likely to make a wrong guess and implement it. That obviously
>>> won't help.
>>>
>>> The commit message already describes the issue with WRT3200ACM and WRT32x.
>>>
>>> About the description, do you want me to do something like this?
>>>     description:
>>>       Ignore an incorrect regulatory hint from ROM,
>>>       so userspace can set the correct regulatory domain.
>>> +    WRT3200ACM and WRT32x are known to need this.
>>>
>>> About the property name or flag, do you want me to add a separate flag
>>> for each affected hardware device?
>>> - wrt3200acm,ignore-regulatory-hint
>>> - wrt3200x,ignore-regulatory-hint
>>> - the list may grow if someone decides to add other devices
>>> - and the driver will need to support all of them
>>> - that doesn't make sense, because it isn't scalable
>>
>> You need to describe the actual problem in the hardware or firmware, and
>> then name the property and description accordingly. "Ignore regulatory
>> hint" is clear instruction to the OS what it should do - ignore the
>> wireless-regdb package/instruction etc.
> 
> You probably have it backwards. The driver is taking the hint from the
> hardware ROM, which is fixed and thus wrong once someone carries the
> device to a different country. I.e. it is a quirk saying the _hardware_
> region should not be used.
> 
> Whether one should override the certified settings, or be able to do that,
> is a whole different discussion.
> 

regulatory-hint for me means usually regdb, but even with your meaning
you tell SW what to do - ignore hardware regulatory information.
Property should not tell what SW should do with hardware. Property
should tell what is happening here in the hardware. In this case: what
is the reason behind.

IOW, why user of a board in country X, where regulatory data says X,
should have the correct regulatory data ignored?

Best regards,
Krzysztof