Re: [PATCH] xfs: split an assert in xfs_trans_log_buf

Carlos Maiolino <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 11:36:12AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Split the "irst <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length)" assert into two to
> make it clear which condition fired.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
> index 1e025848811a..a5d25b703dfc 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
> @@ -521,7 +521,8 @@ xfs_trans_log_buf(
>  {
>  	struct xfs_buf_log_item	*bip = bp->b_log_item;
>  
> -	ASSERT(first <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length));
> +	ASSERT(first <= last);
> +	ASSERT(last < BBTOB(bp->b_length));
>  	ASSERT(!(bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_ORDERED));
>  
>  	xfs_trans_dirty_buf(tp, bp);

Ops, I think this fell through the cracks. Looks good though...

Reviewed-by: Carlos Maiolino <[email protected]>


> -- 
> 2.53.0
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.