Re: [PATCH] nios2: remove the architecture
Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.workflows,org.kernel.vger.dmaengine,org.kernel.vger.linux-arch,org.kernel.vger.linux-csky,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-hardening,org.kernel.vger.linux-i2c,org.kernel.vger.linux-iio,org.kernel.vger.linux-kbuild,org.kernel.vger.linux-pci,org.kernel.vger.linux-pwm,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Organization | Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 01:07:46PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 12:41 PM Simon Schuster > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Sure, I'd be glad to do so, but so far I refrained from it as I was a bit > > unsure about the netiquette (can I simply do so by self-proclamation? At > > least the git history seems to suggest so...). > > Up to the existing maintainer, in general. > > I would also suggest changing the support level to "Supported", > instead of "Maintained" -- that would help justify keeping it in > mainline. Supported implies that one gets real money for the job. Is this the case here? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko