Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v3] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology
Takashi Iwai <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:02:24 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.linuxfoundation.lists.ksummit-discuss,dev.linux.lists.ksummit,dev.linux.lists.tech-board-discuss,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 08 Jul 2020 20:14:27 +0200, Dan Williams wrote: > > +Recommended replacements for 'blacklist/whitelist' are: > + 'denylist / allowlist' > + 'blocklist / passlist' I started looking through the tree now and noticed there are lots of patterns like "whitelisted" or "blacklisted". How can the words fit for those? Actually, there are two cases like: - Foo is blacklisted - Allow to load the non-whitelisted cards Currently I'm replacing the former with "Foo is in denylist", but not sure about the latter case. I thought Kees mentioned about this, but don't remember the proposal... In anyway, I'm for the action: Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]> thanks, Takashi _______________________________________________ Ksummit-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss