Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v3] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology
Julia Lawall <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:43:28 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | org.linuxfoundation.lists.ksummit-discuss,dev.linux.lists.ksummit,dev.linux.lists.tech-board-discuss,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2007131043070.2322@hadrien> |
On Mon, 13 Jul 2020, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Wed, 08 Jul 2020 20:14:27 +0200, > Dan Williams wrote: > > > > +Recommended replacements for 'blacklist/whitelist' are: > > + 'denylist / allowlist' > > + 'blocklist / passlist' > > I started looking through the tree now and noticed there are lots of > patterns like "whitelisted" or "blacklisted". How can the words fit > for those? Actually, there are two cases like: > > - Foo is blacklisted > - Allow to load the non-whitelisted cards > > Currently I'm replacing the former with "Foo is in denylist", but not In the denylist? julia > sure about the latter case. I thought Kees mentioned about this, but > don't remember the proposal... > > In anyway, I'm for the action: > Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]> > > > thanks, > > Takashi > _______________________________________________ > Ksummit-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss > _______________________________________________ Ksummit-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss