[mlmmj] 150 email list - only ~100 emails actually sent out, per the exim main.log and member reports
"
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>
Sun, 4 Feb 2024 22:43:28 -0800
| Newsgroups |
org.mlmmj.mlmmj |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------Jni6R0dV95UouSXL4Xckf0O6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
I've been seeing a strange behavior with one of our mlmmj lists, for
several months now.
Running about 12 different mlmmj (closed) lists for a small org, all on
the same CentOS 7 server. The smallest lists have 10-15 emails, with
the largest averaging about 150 emails. These mlmmj lists have been in
existence for many years, mostly without any troubles.
Recently (6-8 months) the largest list (~150 emails) has not been
sending all the emails out - it varies but I'd say 60-80% of list
members have an email sent, but the rest of the emails on the list
receive nothing.
The exim main.log file contains log entries for the emails that do go
out, but there is no sign of the other emails in the list that mlmmj
appears to miss completely.
It does not appear to be exactly the same "missing" emails each time,
but it does appear that the "missing" emails are physically farther down
the actual list of emails in the subscribers.d/email_list.txt file.
The smaller lists are working without any issues, ie. emails
consistently sent to all list members.
This behavior first appeared with mlmmj 1.3 installed - I have recently
upgraded the server to mlmmj 1.4.4, but this behavior is still there.
Within the exim.conf file, I have tried adjusting the
"smtp_accept_max_per_connection" and "smtp_accept_max" configuration
settings (and re-starting exim) but the behavior persists.
I'm struggling to determine what might be happening, and of course this
is concerning for the organization, as it cannot rely on mlmmj to get
communications out to all the members on the email list.
Has anyone seen this before? Does anyone have an idea where I could
start looking for the source of the problem?
Any advice and help would be very appreciated!
Philip
--------------Jni6R0dV95UouSXL4Xckf0O6
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">I've been seeing a strange
behavior with one of our mlmmj lists, for several months now.<br>
<br>
Running about 12 different mlmmj (closed) lists for a small org,
all on the same CentOS 7 server. The smallest lists have 10-15
emails, with the largest averaging about 150 emails. These mlmmj
lists have been in existence for many years, mostly without any
troubles.<br>
<br>
Recently (6-8 months) the largest list (~150 emails) has not been
sending all the emails out - it varies but I'd say 60-80% of list
members have an email sent, but the rest of the emails on the list
receive nothing.<br>
<br>
The exim main.log file contains log entries for the emails that do
go out, but there is no sign of the other emails in the list that
mlmmj appears to miss completely. <br>
<br>
It does not appear to be exactly the same "missing" emails each
time, but it does appear that the "missing" emails are physically
farther down the actual list of emails in the
subscribers.d/email_list.txt file.<br>
<br>
The smaller lists are working without any issues, ie. emails
consistently sent to all list members.<br>
<br>
This behavior first appeared with mlmmj 1.3 installed - I have
recently upgraded the server to mlmmj 1.4.4, but this behavior is
still there.<br>
<br>
Within the exim.conf file, I have tried adjusting the
"smtp_accept_max_per_connection" and "smtp_accept_max"
configuration settings (and re-starting exim) but the behavior
persists.<br>
<br>
I'm struggling to determine what might be happening, and of course
this is concerning for the organization, as it cannot rely on
mlmmj to get communications out to all the members on the email
list. <br>
<br>
Has anyone seen this before? Does anyone have an idea where I
could start looking for the source of the problem?<br>
<br>
Any advice and help would be very appreciated!<br>
<br>
Philip<br>
</font><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"><br>
</font><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"><br>
</font>
</body>
</html>
--------------Jni6R0dV95UouSXL4Xckf0O6--