Re: [PATCH 0/2] target/riscv: Fix seed CSR sign extension
Michael Tokarev <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.nongnu.qemu-riscv,org.nongnu.qemu-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/2/26 14:31, Ivan Efremov wrote: > The seed CSR value on RV64 was sign extended while converting to target_ulong. > > The first patch makes SEED_OPST_* unsigned. > The second patch adds qtest to check that upper 32 bits are zero. > > Tests ran: > - riscv-csr-test > - make check: 324 passed, 11 skipped > - RISC-V Zkr-00 architectural test > > Ivan Efremov (2): > target/riscv: Fix seed CSR sign extension > tests/qtest: Add seed CSR zero extension test I'm picking this patch set for the currently active qemu stable series (10.0 LTS, 11.0, 11.1). However, it does not work on 11.0.x already (it works ok on 11.1.x), the test fails: TAP version 14 # random seed: R02Sac6635c76a7dc335fadd70845da72f99 1..2 # Start of riscv64 tests # Start of cpu tests # starting QEMU: exec ./qemu-system-riscv64 -qtest unix:/tmp/qtest-182934.sock -qtest-log /dev/null -chardev socket,path=/tmp/qtest-182934.qmp,id=char0 -mon chardev=char0,mode=control -display none -audio none -run-with exit-with-parent=on -machine virt -cpu veyron-v1 -accel qtest ok 1 /riscv64/cpu/csr # Start of csr tests # starting QEMU: exec ./qemu-system-riscv64 -qtest unix:/tmp/qtest-182934.sock -qtest-log /dev/null -chardev socket,path=/tmp/qtest-182934.qmp,id=char0 -mon chardev=char0,mode=control -display none -audio none -run-with exit-with-parent=on -machine virt -cpu tt-ascalon -accel qtest ** ERROR:../../build/qemu/11.0/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c:78:csr_call: assertion failed: (ret == RISCV_EXCP_NONE) Bail out! ERROR:../../build/qemu/11.0/hw/riscv/riscv_hart.c:78:csr_call: assertion failed: (ret == RISCV_EXCP_NONE) Broken pipe ../../build/qemu/11.0/tests/qtest/libqtest.c:210: kill_qemu() detected QEMU death from signal 6 (Aborted) Aborted Should I pick something else for 11.0 and 10.0 (on 10.0 it fails the same way), so the test succeeds, or should I drop this patch set from 11.1.x? Thanks, /mjt