Re: [PATCH] hw/vfio: Drop superfluous inclusion of hw-error.h

On 5/5/26 10:18, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Mon, 4 May 2026 at 16:04, Cédric Le Goater <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 4/28/26 18:37, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> Applied to
>>
>>       https://github.com/legoater/qemu vfio-next
>>
>> Please base future contributions on this branch.
> 
> In general I think it's better if we don't have odd subsystem
> specific requirements like this. The general assumption for
> QEMU patches should be that they are based on the current
> head-of-git. 

ok

> I don't want to have to remember that vfio
> is weird if I'm doing a patch that touches more than one
> part of the codebase. If you're accumulating so much
> stuff in vfio-next that it's problematic to have new
> patches based on head-of-git, then my feeling is that
> you're not sending pullreqs regularly enough.

Fair enough.

I have had to deal with cases in the past where there were
ordering headaches. I agree we should promote using the HEAD
always.

I will remove that last sentence from my "applied" script.

Thanks,

C.