Re: 回覆: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: ipmi: Add optional LPC properties to ASPEED BT devices

Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Jul 2026 07:56:06 +0200
Newsgroups org.ozlabs.lists.linux-aspeed,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 13/07/2026 07:34, YC Hsieh wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 08:11:34AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
>> What
>>
>> is
>>
>> with
>>
>> this
>>
>> line breaks?
> 
> Apologies for the broken formatting in the commit message.
> I will fix it in the next revision.
> 
>> No, you do not get second reg property.
>>
>> No, you do not get second interrupts property.
> 
> Understood.
> 
> These values are not addressable resources of the BMC node itself;
> rather, they describe how the BMC's LPC engine is exposed on the host
> LPC bus. I am not sure how they should be represented in DT, since
> they do not seem to fit the usual semantics of either "reg" or "interrupts".
> 
> Do you have a preferred way to represent this kind of host-facing LPC
> configuration in the binding?

I don't understand what you are referring to, entire context is gone
because essentially you top-posted.

Best regards,
Krzysztof