Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] serial: 8250_aspeed_vuart: add VUART over PCI
Grégoire Layet <[email protected]> Tue, 14 Jul 2026 08:33:53 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.ozlabs.lists.linux-aspeed,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-serial |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFi2wKZRVbmCwprkxGZoxib8BrFd9kDS3H2cDmykEorB5S7Xrw@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Jiri, On Thu, 9 Jul 2026 at 07:17, Jiri Slaby <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 08. 07. 26, 17:35, Grégoire Layet wrote: > ... > > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_aspeed_vuart.c > > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_aspeed_vuart.c > > @@ -32,6 +32,26 @@ > > #define ASPEED_VUART_DEFAULT_SIRQ 4 > > #define ASPEED_VUART_DEFAULT_SIRQ_POLARITY IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW > > > > +#define ASPEED_SCU_SILICON_REVISION_ID 0x04 > > +#define AST2600A3_REVISION_ID 0x05030303 > > + > > +#define ASPEED_SCUC24 0xC24 > > +#define ASPEED_SCUC24_MSI_ROUTING_MASK GENMASK(11, 10) > > +#define ASPEED_SCUC24_MSI_ROUTING_PCIE2LPC_PCIDEV1 (0x2 << 10) > > So is this > FIELD_PREP(ASPEED_SCUC24_MSI_ROUTING_MASK, 2) > ? Yes, replaced > > > +#define ASPEED_SCUC24_PCIDEV1_INTX_MSI_HOST2BMC_EN BIT(18) > > +#define ASPEED_SCUC24_PCIDEV1_INTX_MSI_SCU560_EN BIT(17) > > Perhaps switch the two (to be in asc order)? And define 14 as _RESERVED > as well? Acknowledged. I have also removed the comment afterwards. > > +#define ASPEED_SCU_PCIE_CONF_CTRL 0xC20 > > Hmm, should these go before 0xC24? Yes Thanks for the feedback, I have made the changes for the next revision. Regards, Grégoire