Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mmc: dt-bindings: sdhci-of-aspeed: Add AST2700 fallback compatibles

On 18/03/2026 09:09, Ryan Chen wrote:
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mmc: dt-bindings: sdhci-of-aspeed: Add AST2700
>> fallback compatibles
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 01:56:42PM +0800, Ryan Chen wrote:
>>> Describe AST2700 as compatible with the existing AST2600 SD controller
>>> and SDHCI bindings by requiring fallback compatibles in the device tree.
>>>
>>> Also require `resets` on the AST2700 SD controller node.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Chen <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - add missing blank line
>>> - modify ast2700 compatible items const
>>
>> Why?
>>
>>> ---
>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/aspeed,sdhci.yaml      | 39
>> +++++++++++++++++-----
>>>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/aspeed,sdhci.yaml
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/aspeed,sdhci.yaml
>>> index d24950ccea95..9c8e068964a1 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/aspeed,sdhci.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/aspeed,sdhci.yaml
>>> @@ -22,10 +22,14 @@ description: |+
>>>
>>>  properties:
>>>    compatible:
>>> -    enum:
>>> -      - aspeed,ast2400-sd-controller
>>> -      - aspeed,ast2500-sd-controller
>>> -      - aspeed,ast2600-sd-controller
>>> +    oneOf:
>>> +      - const: aspeed,ast2400-sd-controller
>>> +      - const: aspeed,ast2500-sd-controller
>>> +      - const: aspeed,ast2600-sd-controller
>>
>> No, previous code was correct.
>>
>> Is this some microslop LLM product? I questioned style last time and now we
>> got random changes without explanation.
>>
>> Please confirm - did you use any LLM microslop tools to create this patch?
> No I create it with B4. And commit each by each, I don't use LLM to porting this.
> 
>> Please also confirm - who internally reviewed this patch before posting?
> I port this and do test in my side and confirm it.
> 
> 
> In https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260314-flat-topaz-peacock-440a9c@quoll/#t 
> You request drop driver compatible; 
> Base on your instruction, So I do my study in Linux.
> Use following to do compatible. Not add driver compatible string.

Replacing enum into list of const is not related/relevant to what you
wanted to achieve.

Best regards,
Krzysztof