RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] mmc: dt-bindings: sdhci-of-aspeed: Add AST2700 fallback compatibles
Ryan Chen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.ozlabs.lists.openbmc,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-mmc,org.ozlabs.lists.linux-aspeed |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <TY2PPF5CB9A1BE666DEF10944BBA2A2256BF24EA@TY2PPF5CB9A1BE6.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com> |
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mmc: dt-bindings: sdhci-of-aspeed: Add AST2700 > fallback compatibles > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 01:56:42PM +0800, Ryan Chen wrote: > > Describe AST2700 as compatible with the existing AST2600 SD controller > > and SDHCI bindings by requiring fallback compatibles in the device tree. > > > > Also require `resets` on the AST2700 SD controller node. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ryan Chen <[email protected]> > > --- > > Changes in v2: > > - add missing blank line > > - modify ast2700 compatible items const > > Why? > > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/aspeed,sdhci.yaml | 39 > +++++++++++++++++----- > > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/aspeed,sdhci.yaml > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/aspeed,sdhci.yaml > > index d24950ccea95..9c8e068964a1 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/aspeed,sdhci.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/aspeed,sdhci.yaml > > @@ -22,10 +22,14 @@ description: |+ > > > > properties: > > compatible: > > - enum: > > - - aspeed,ast2400-sd-controller > > - - aspeed,ast2500-sd-controller > > - - aspeed,ast2600-sd-controller > > + oneOf: > > + - const: aspeed,ast2400-sd-controller > > + - const: aspeed,ast2500-sd-controller > > + - const: aspeed,ast2600-sd-controller > > No, previous code was correct. > > Is this some microslop LLM product? I questioned style last time and now we > got random changes without explanation. > > Please confirm - did you use any LLM microslop tools to create this patch? No I create it with B4. And commit each by each, I don't use LLM to porting this. > Please also confirm - who internally reviewed this patch before posting? I port this and do test in my side and confirm it. In https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260314-flat-topaz-peacock-440a9c@quoll/#t You request drop driver compatible; Base on your instruction, So I do my study in Linux. Use following to do compatible. Not add driver compatible string. https://lore.kernel.org/all/TY2PPF5CB9A1BE642DFDE4862B40BBAA1DBF240A@TY2PPF5CB9A1BE6.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com/ That is my follow up porting, not use LLM.