Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] arm: draeger : Dräger M48 o n NXP i.MX6(Q) and Intel/Altera SoCFPGA Cyclone V devicetree.

Petko Manolov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.u-boot-project.lists.u-boot
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 26-08-19 13:43:26, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Petko,
> 
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2026 at 12:30 PM Petko Manolov
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Petko Manolov <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/dts/Makefile                         |   3 +
> >  arch/arm/dts/imx6dl-draeger-m48.dts           |  24 ++
> >  arch/arm/dts/imx6q-draeger-m48.dts            |  24 ++
> >  arch/arm/dts/imx6qdl-draeger-m48-u-boot.dtsi  |  20 +
> >  arch/arm/dts/imx6qdl-draeger-m48.dtsi         | 369 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  arch/arm/dts/imx6qp-draeger-m48.dts           |  78 ++++
> 
> Sorry if I wasn't clear, but what I meant in my previous comment is that you
> need to upstream these DTS to Linux first.

Unfortunately this board runs QNX, not Linux, so upstreaming them doesn't make
sense.

> That's where the real DTS review happens. Make sure the new devicetree files
> pass dt-schema validation.
> 
> You should send the i.MX and SoCFPGA patches separately to the Linux folks for
> review.
> 
> In U-Boot, we want to use the DTS directly from the upstream Linux repo.

Can i use some sort of DT validation tool that pass kernel's requirements?


		Petko
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.