Re: [PATCH v5 13/13] arm: u8500: Package Stemmy device trees in FIT

Stephan Gerhold <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.u-boot-project.lists.u-boot
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, Aug 23, 2026 at 10:39:32PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Build all seven supported Samsung Ux500 device trees into the FIT
> appended to U-Boot. Select the appropriate configuration at runtime
> from the machine ID passed by the Samsung firmware. Codina and Codina
> TMO share a machine ID, so distinguish Codina TMO by its board ID.
> 
> Keep a Kconfig default for the generic multi-DTB build dependency, but
> remove it from the defconfig since the board selection is now dynamic.
> Print the firmware machine and board IDs to aid diagnostics and future
> machine ID mappings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>

Yes! This is great, thanks :)

> ---
>  arch/arm/Kconfig          |  1 +
>  board/ste/stemmy/Kconfig  |  6 ++++
>  board/ste/stemmy/stemmy.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  configs/stemmy_defconfig  |  1 -
>  4 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index 2a01ac9b7675..8e697b87d50f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -1278,6 +1278,7 @@ config ARCH_U8500
>  	imply DM_REGULATOR
>  	imply DM_REGULATOR_FIXED
>  	imply DM_RTC
> +	imply MULTI_DTB_FIT
>  	imply NOMADIK_GPIO
>  	imply NOMADIK_MTU_TIMER
>  	imply PINCTRL

It's a bit weird to have this in ARCH_U8500 since there may be other
(non-Samsung) U8500 boards who couldn't use MULTI_DTB_FIT.

Can you put this into stemmy_defconfig?

> diff --git a/board/ste/stemmy/Kconfig b/board/ste/stemmy/Kconfig
> index b890ba51cb03..e891ddf9f8b2 100644
> --- a/board/ste/stemmy/Kconfig
> +++ b/board/ste/stemmy/Kconfig
> @@ -9,4 +9,10 @@ config SYS_VENDOR
>  config SYS_CONFIG_NAME
>  	default "stemmy"
>  
> +config DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE
> +	default "st/ste-ux500-samsung-janice"
> +
> +config OF_LIST
> +	default "st/ste-ux500-samsung-codina st/ste-ux500-samsung-codina-tmo st/ste-ux500-samsung-gavini st/ste-ux500-samsung-golden st/ste-ux500-samsung-janice st/ste-ux500-samsung-kyle st/ste-ux500-samsung-skomer"
> +
>  endif

I don't mind adding this here, but I'm also not sure if there is any
advantage compared to adding this directly in stemmy_defconfig?

Thanks,
Stephan
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.