Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] i2c/clk: spacemit: k1: fix I2C bus configuration and clock handling
"Junhui Liu" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.u-boot-project.lists.u-boot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Heiko, Thanks for checking. On Mon Aug 24, 2026 at 4:21 PM CST, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Yao Zi, Junhui Liu, > > On 18.08.26 08:53, Yao Zi wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 15, 2026 at 11:40:20AM +0800, Junhui Liu wrote: >>> Fix two issues in the SpacemiT K1 I2C driver and clock provider. >>> >>> The first issue is that the controller bus mode is selected using the >>> functional clock rate instead of the requested I2C bus speed from the >>> device tree. >>> >>> The second issue is that the TWSI functional clocks incorrectly include >>> the bus clock enable bit in their gate masks. As a result the I2C driver >>> can operate with only the functional clock enabled, which diverges from >>> the device tree description and the Linux driver (both expect separate >>> "func" and "bus" clocks). >>> >>> To fix the second issue without breaking intermediate states, the >>> patches are ordered as follows: >>> >>> - First add the missing bus clocks (and their parent chain) to the SPL >>> clock tree. >>> - Then update the I2C driver to acquire and enable both the functional >>> and bus clocks by name. >>> - Finally remove the bus gate bit from the functional clock definitions >>> (except TWSI8, whose write-only register requires the combined gate). >> >> Personally I think it's okay to break booting in this case as long as >> you explicitly point it out. Merging the conceptually related PATCH 2 >> and PATCH 4 which together fix description of TWSI controller clocks >> would make the commit description shorter and clearer. But it depends on >> you. > > For me the series is okay now, if you (Junhui Liu) have not prepared a > v3 with the merge Yao Zi explained already ... I will pick v2 up for next... > > Please give me feedback, what you plan, thanks! I don't plan to send a v3. I think the current structure and patch ordering in v2 are fine, so please feel free to pick it up. Thanks to you and Yao Zi for the review. > >> For the whole series, >> >> Reviewed-by: Yao Zi <[email protected]> > > Thanks! > > bye, > Heiko >> >> Regards, >> Yao Zi >> -- Best regards, Junhui Liu