Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Rewrite initialize_cpu_data() for clarity

On 13.08.2026 16:53, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Without passing opinion on the behaviour of this function, it is deceptive to
> read (I've twice now mistaken it for resetting boot_cpu_data), and
> inefficient.
> 
> Instead of having a 256 byte object on the stack and a double copy, copy
> boot_cpu_data directly, then reset parts of cpu_data[cpu] in place.  Leave
> some comments behind explaining what's happening.
> 
> No functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <[email protected]>

While I think it was good enough before, I also don't mind the change:
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>

Jan