Re: [AUH][PATCH v3 3/4] upgrade-helper.py: Add stable option for patch-only upgrades
Daniel Turull <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.yoctoproject.lists.yocto-patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <PA3PR07MB10721BBBEDB19758D2B399E7B8A312@PA3PR07MB10721.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> |
Yes, I can keep the rest locally and wait for the oe/bitbake to get resolved and backported to scarthgap. I believe patch 2 will be needed at some point by the other series, so they can build on top. In the meantime to avoid duplication of efforts I'll focus on the changelog to be integrated with oe-core. Thanks Daniel ________________________________ From: Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 4, 2026 9:52 AM To: Daniel Turull <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AUH][PATCH v3 3/4] upgrade-helper.py: Add stable option for patch-only upgrades On Mon, 4 May 2026 at 09:34, Daniel Turull <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sorry, I misunderstood you. I though it was only the changelog going into devtool. > > I'll check the bitbake-level. I missed it. I meant particular this response to a patch from elsewhere that aims for a similar function: https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.openembedded.org%2Fg%2Fbitbake-devel%2Fmessage%2F19414&data=05%7C02%7Cdaniel.turull%40ericsson.com%7Ce3d0c1c80f124f1c639d08dea9b21238%7C92e84cebfbfd47abbe52080c6b87953f%7C0%7C0%7C639134779439726477%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=h0JNlQNZUVuuoe1IReAyBWXaWPNSbtscOLuJCA1w20Y%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.openembedded.org/g/bitbake-devel/message/19414> > So we keep patch 1, 2 and 4? Probably the most important is 2 [PATCH v3 2/4] upgrade-helper.py: Add compatibility with Yocto scarthgap, the other two can be optional. I have to ask, if 2 is applied, would that be useful without the ability to pick only stable bugfix-only updates? You'll probably have to maintain both 2 and 3 privately while the 'stable updates' issue is resolved properly in oe-core/bitbake master. 1/4 seems fine, the function of 4/4 is fine but I need to review the code. Alex