Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) 04 Aug 2000 15:04:29 -0400
| Newsgroups | perl.bootstrap |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'd like to find out how to notice the apathy. How do you tell the difference between lurkers and apathy? <chaim> >>>>> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[email protected]> writes: DS> At 12:55 AM 8/5/00 +0900, Simon Cozens wrote: >> The question is, then, how do we sufficiently register apathy? DS> I think it's the job of the WG chair the RFC is ultimately presented to to DS> notice apathy. I'm tempted to say that general apathy dooms an RFC as well, DS> though the big WG chair certainly has the option to say yes for the tepid DS> suggestions. (Barring a Larry veto, of course) -- Chaim Frenkel Nonlinear Knowledge, Inc. [email protected] +1-718-236-0183