Re: RFCs: two proposals for change

At 03:04 PM 8/4/00 -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote:
>I'd like to find out how to notice the apathy. How do you tell the difference
>between lurkers and apathy?

I'll leave that as an issue for one of the language working groups. (I 
expect Damian's got an RFC for it...)

> >>>>> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[email protected]> writes:
>
>DS> At 12:55 AM 8/5/00 +0900, Simon Cozens wrote:
> >> The question is, then, how do we sufficiently register apathy?
>
>DS> I think it's the job of the WG chair the RFC is ultimately presented 
>to to
>DS> notice apathy. I'm tempted to say that general apathy dooms an RFC as 
>well,
>DS> though the big WG chair certainly has the option to say yes for the tepid
>DS> suggestions. (Barring a Larry veto, of course)
>
>--
>Chaim Frenkel                                        Nonlinear Knowledge, Inc.
>[email protected]                                               +1-718-236-0183


					Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[email protected]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk