Re: Perforce vs CVS

[email protected] (Simon Cozens)
Newsgroups perl.bootstrap
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 09:11:29PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Er... CVS has done branching and three-way merging since the beginning of
> CVS; that was one of the whole original points behind CVS.  So I guess I'm
> missing the thrust of this point of Perforce.  I've been curious for a bit
> what makes Perforce so much better too, so I'd love to hear more.
> 
> Is it just that three-way merges are easier/better?  How so?

http://www.perforce.com/perforce/cvs.html is obviously biased, but reasonably
accurate.

-- 
Calm down, it's *only* ones and zeroes.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.