Re: Perforce vs CVS
[email protected] (Nick Ing-Simmons)
| Newsgroups | perl.bootstrap |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> writes: > >Er... CVS has done branching and three-way merging since the beginning of >CVS; that was one of the whole original points behind CVS. So I guess I'm >missing the thrust of this point of Perforce. I've been curious for a bit >what makes Perforce so much better too, so I'd love to hear more. > >Is it just that three-way merges are easier/better? How so? The three way merges are a tad worse than GNU three-way merge. Perforce's strengths are SPEED and ease of setup. -- Nick Ing-Simmons