Re: Perforce vs CVS
[email protected] (Nick Ing-Simmons)
| Newsgroups | perl.bootstrap |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> writes: >Adam Turoff <[email protected]> writes: > >> Perforce has no native network security model. Security is handled >> through ssh and other such tricks. > >CVS shares this drawback. You don't ever want to use pserver for anything >other than anonymous access to the repository; for any commit access, you >want to handle the security with ssh or some other similar system. But the ssh issue is exactly what has caused the perception that perl5 perforce depot is "closed" - getting one's ssh key registered was not as easy as it could/should have been. -- Nick Ing-Simmons