Re: Possible conflict of interest?

[email protected] (Simon Cozens)
Newsgroups perl.bootstrap
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 06:16:51PM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> I'll gnaw my own scrotum off before Activestate, O'Reilly, Manning,
> Microsoft, or IBM have a corporate stake in perl6.

Greg, can we find a slot for this at YAPC::Europe?

Seriously, these companies already have a stake in Perl 6, and that's
good and healthy. They have a lot of money riding on it, I'm sure.
The question is whether we want to show apparent favouritism by
picking out one of these companies and giving their CEO a seat on
the "Perl Cabinet". It seems to be on somewhat dodgy ground.

If we're going to have a liaison working group for corporates, vendors and 
users, why can't we have someone community-focused like Chris Nandor[1]
to lead it?

[1] Argh, then people might claim a VA conflict of interest. Yes, this
is tricky, isn't it?
-- 
10.0 times 0.1 is hardly ever 1.0.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.