Re: Possible conflict of interest?
[email protected] (Simon Cozens)
| Newsgroups | perl.bootstrap |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 06:16:51PM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote: > I'll gnaw my own scrotum off before Activestate, O'Reilly, Manning, > Microsoft, or IBM have a corporate stake in perl6. Greg, can we find a slot for this at YAPC::Europe? Seriously, these companies already have a stake in Perl 6, and that's good and healthy. They have a lot of money riding on it, I'm sure. The question is whether we want to show apparent favouritism by picking out one of these companies and giving their CEO a seat on the "Perl Cabinet". It seems to be on somewhat dodgy ground. If we're going to have a liaison working group for corporates, vendors and users, why can't we have someone community-focused like Chris Nandor[1] to lead it? [1] Argh, then people might claim a VA conflict of interest. Yes, this is tricky, isn't it? -- 10.0 times 0.1 is hardly ever 1.0.