Re: Mailing lists and RFCs
[email protected] ("Kurt D. Starsinic")
| Newsgroups | perl.bootstrap |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 10:08:23AM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 12:36:05AM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> >
> > The RFC format is plain text, slightly structured. I've enclosed
> > a sample at the end of this message. The major components are:
> > - Title
> > - Metadata (Maintainer, Date, Version, Mailing List, Number)
> > - Abstract
> > - Description of the change
> > - List of possible implementations (doesn't have to be at the bit
> > level unless you're talking a bit-level change) that were discussed,
> > with quick summary of pros and cons.
> > - Suggested choice of implementation.
>
> I'd like to (strongly) suggest that the RFCs use basic pod.
Yes. It is our dog food, and we should eat it.
Peace,
* Kurt Starsinic ([email protected]) ---------- Senior Network Engineer *
| `It is impossible to achieve the aim without suffering.' -- J. G. Bennett |