Re: new toy
[email protected] ((Richard Foley)) Mon, 27 Aug 2001 13:00:20 +0200
| Newsgroups | perl.bugmongers |
|---|---|
| Organization | RFI |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"H.Merijn Brand" wrote: > > One point of attention I need to show: What if more than one of the bugadmins > sends in a close mail with *different* comments and/or different close reasons > (e.g me thinking to close the bug as duplicate with comments on why it is a > duplicate of which bug, Richard sending a mail to close it as notabug, and > Micheal closing it just as closed) consider what to do with the comments or > what status should win (duplicate might be a win over closed and/or notabug, > but also might fall to pray for circular references) > Latest wins ie; if you close a bug with a note, then I decide it should remain open (and do that), and Rob re-disagrees (it should indeed be closed) - we get a bug with 3 notes and the current (closed) status. The notes are just assigned to the bug in sequential order, we want the entire history of comments, of course? -- Ciao Richard Foley Ciao - shorter than AufWiederSehen!