Re: Rejecting uploads without (an appropriate) license?

Adam Kennedy wrote:
> There's a few classes of checks we can do.
> 
> If the package has a META.yml, it should have a license field. There are 
> about a dozen legitimate values.
> 
> license 'restrictive'
> 
> The is an absolute positive match for a disallowed license.
> 
> A check covering the above case could safely be added immediately.
> 
> Beyond that you have three additional cases...
> 
> - The license value exists but is not a known type
> 
> - There is no license value in the META.yml
> 
> - There is no META.yml

There is a snapshot of how the license field in META.yml is used at:

   <http://thepierianspring.org/perl/meta>

     1 GPL             # wrong case
     4 GPL version 2   # invalid value
     3 GPLv2           # invalid value
     3 INVALID         # These have a url as a value
     1 LGPL            # wrong case
  3619 NONE            # No license field
     1 Perl            # wrong case
    50 artistic
    26 bsd
    61 gpl
     6 lgpl
    10 open_source
  1497 perl
     2 restrictive
    26 unknown         # invalid value: literal 'unknown'
     3 unrestricted

There should probably be a gpl2 & gpl3. Do we care about case?

Randy.