Re: YAML (maybe other modules) might need CPAN smoking

[email protected] (David Golden) Tue, 5 Jul 2016 08:18:56 -0400

Newsgroups	perl.cpan.workers
Message-ID	<CAOeq1c_rFYL3_DChPaZqcw1o-7wfrg1vkSnUc8W6POjfFGEhDA@mail.gmail.com>

YAML or YAML::Tiny? Only the latter is tool chain.
On Jul 5, 2016 8:14 AM, "Sawyer X" <[email protected]> wrote:

> YAML broke some stuff.
>
> I'm beginning to think that YAML is one of the modules that could
> really use a CPAN smoke of its own. I think the more upriver the
> module, the more this becomes relevant.
>
> Thoughts?
>