Re: YAML (maybe other modules) might need CPAN smoking

[email protected] (Sawyer X) Tue, 5 Jul 2016 14:34:03 +0200

Newsgroups	perl.cpan.workers
Message-ID	<CAMvkq_Tv+Wz7dQA4PoN9tqcNV0ed5N5kZBbK0wdJ5hCBDdVQ6A@mail.gmail.com>

YAML.pm.

It isn't tool chain, but it is relatively upriver, so I thought this
group would be interested. Additionally this idea can extend to
non-core toolchain tools.

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:18 PM, David Golden <[email protected]> wrote:
> YAML or YAML::Tiny? Only the latter is tool chain.
>
> On Jul 5, 2016 8:14 AM, "Sawyer X" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> YAML broke some stuff.
>>
>> I'm beginning to think that YAML is one of the modules that could
>> really use a CPAN smoke of its own. I think the more upriver the
>> module, the more this becomes relevant.
>>
>> Thoughts?