Re: patch

[email protected] (Nicholas Clark)
Newsgroups perl.daily-build
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 03:18:47PM +0200, H . Merijn Brand wrote:
> Check my new sig!
> 
> On Fri 24 Aug 2001 14:56, Nicholas Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 05:10:22PM +0200, H . Merijn Brand wrote:

> > > 	5. added Makefile.PL (not ready for use (yet))
> > 
> > Why does this require 5.6?
> 
> open my $fh, "< blah" or die "foo: $!";

Ah

> > Attached should be the complete diffs I'm running with. I'm not suggesting
>            ^^^^^^^^^ ?
> > that all the bits of the patches should go in, but I did find

It's defensive typing. I'm in xemacs editing a message. When I go back to
mutt I have to remember to attach the files. Sometimes I forget (As I appear
to have done with that message) so I feel more honest in saying that I mean
to attach them, not that they "are" attached. It's probably silly, and
confusing.

> Enlighten me, FreeBSD does *not* support mailx?
> IIRC, earlier versions of mail (maby very old, did not support the -s option
> to pass the subject, that's why I chose mailx)

It would appear that mailx is in the ports collection, and not built by
default. A straw pole of the 3 BSD machines I have access to:

nick@plum [nick]$ whereis mailx
mailx: /usr/ports/mail/mailx
nick@plum [nick]$ mailx
bash: mailx: command not found

nick@roast [nick]$ whereis mailx
mailx: /usr/ports/mail/mailx
nick@roast [nick]$ mailx
bash: mailx: command not found

nwc10@colon nwc10$ whereis mailx
mailx: /usr/ports/mail/mailx
nwc10@colon nwc10$ mailx
bash: mailx: command not found


> > FreeBSD can't do long doubles, so no need to build duplicate tests.
> 
> If $^O for FreeBSD is "FreeBSD", would the following change do?
> 
> if ($^O =~ m/^(?: hpux | FreeBSD )$/x && $conf =~ m/longdouble|morebits/) {

It's freebsd, so ~ m/^(?: hpux | freebsd )$/x will match.

> > It would be nice if the 5.005_03 incompatible "open my $pol" were not used,
> > as it means mktest.pl needs editing if it is to be run on a machine without
> > 5.6 or later installed.
> 
> Did you detect any other deps, I've gotten so used to it now that I tend to
> forget what is new in 5.6 :)

I think that that was it for 5.6isms.

Ooh. New instructions in sig:

> send smoke reports to: [email protected], QA: http://qa.perl.org

Nicholas Clark
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.