Re: patch
[email protected] (Nicholas Clark)
| Newsgroups | perl.daily-build |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 03:18:47PM +0200, H . Merijn Brand wrote: > Check my new sig! > > On Fri 24 Aug 2001 14:56, Nicholas Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 05:10:22PM +0200, H . Merijn Brand wrote: > > > 5. added Makefile.PL (not ready for use (yet)) > > > > Why does this require 5.6? > > open my $fh, "< blah" or die "foo: $!"; Ah > > Attached should be the complete diffs I'm running with. I'm not suggesting > ^^^^^^^^^ ? > > that all the bits of the patches should go in, but I did find It's defensive typing. I'm in xemacs editing a message. When I go back to mutt I have to remember to attach the files. Sometimes I forget (As I appear to have done with that message) so I feel more honest in saying that I mean to attach them, not that they "are" attached. It's probably silly, and confusing. > Enlighten me, FreeBSD does *not* support mailx? > IIRC, earlier versions of mail (maby very old, did not support the -s option > to pass the subject, that's why I chose mailx) It would appear that mailx is in the ports collection, and not built by default. A straw pole of the 3 BSD machines I have access to: nick@plum [nick]$ whereis mailx mailx: /usr/ports/mail/mailx nick@plum [nick]$ mailx bash: mailx: command not found nick@roast [nick]$ whereis mailx mailx: /usr/ports/mail/mailx nick@roast [nick]$ mailx bash: mailx: command not found nwc10@colon nwc10$ whereis mailx mailx: /usr/ports/mail/mailx nwc10@colon nwc10$ mailx bash: mailx: command not found > > FreeBSD can't do long doubles, so no need to build duplicate tests. > > If $^O for FreeBSD is "FreeBSD", would the following change do? > > if ($^O =~ m/^(?: hpux | FreeBSD )$/x && $conf =~ m/longdouble|morebits/) { It's freebsd, so ~ m/^(?: hpux | freebsd )$/x will match. > > It would be nice if the 5.005_03 incompatible "open my $pol" were not used, > > as it means mktest.pl needs editing if it is to be run on a machine without > > 5.6 or later installed. > > Did you detect any other deps, I've gotten so used to it now that I tend to > forget what is new in 5.6 :) I think that that was it for 5.6isms. Ooh. New instructions in sig: > send smoke reports to: [email protected], QA: http://qa.perl.org Nicholas Clark