Re: Building on RH 8.0 using UML
[email protected] (Robert Spier)
| Newsgroups | perl.daily-build |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> So it looks like the alarm isn't killing the eval before the while > terminates. Weird. I wonder if this will happen in pure C code that does a similar busy wait. It may have to do with delayed signal delivery or such at the UML level. -R