Re: Building on RH 8.0 using UML
[email protected] (Mike Stok)
| Newsgroups | perl.daily-build |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Robert Spier wrote: > > So it looks like the alarm isn't killing the eval before the while > > terminates. > > Weird. > > I wonder if this will happen in pure C code that does a similar busy > wait. It may have to do with delayed signal delivery or such at the > UML level. That sounds like a good avenuye of exploration; I'll look into it and report back. Mike -- [email protected] | The "`Stok' disclaimers" apply. http://www.stok.co.uk/~mike/ | GPG PGP Key 1024D/059913DA [email protected] | Fingerprint 0570 71CD 6790 7C28 3D60 http://www.exegenix.com/ | 75D2 9EC4 C1C0 0599 13DA