Re: Guidance on the implications of the Lyon Amendment
[email protected] (David Cantrell) Thu, 25 Jul 2024 23:46:32 +0100
| Newsgroups | perl.module-authors |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 25/07/2024 19:24, Todd Rinaldo wrote: > >Yeah, such an index would remove a lot of the tension between these > different interests, though it wouldn't eliminate all of it. We may > >need to be more proactive with recruiting someone (or some people) to > actually set it up. > > I continue to wonder if there’s value in setting this up. Who needs 5.6 > or 5.8, etc. so desperately that we need to maintain this stream? How do > we know when they don’t need it? When I wrote that exact system it was because I wanted it for my perl 5.6 and 5.8 CPAN testing boxes, so I could test new releases with old, working dependencies. That's quite a long way from a "real world" use case though! More useful was that it also supported per-OS CPAN mirrors, so if you only wanted versions of modules that were known to work on NetBSD, for example, you could get that. I added that feature because an actual real-world user asked for it. I can see that it would be useful for people on things like Windows where support is a bit flakey because authors don't have access to it. -- David Cantrell