Re: Guidance on the implications of the Lyon Amendment

[email protected] (David Cantrell) Thu, 25 Jul 2024 23:46:32 +0100
Newsgroups perl.module-authors
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 25/07/2024 19:24, Todd Rinaldo wrote:

>  >Yeah, such an index would remove a lot of the tension between these 
> different interests, though it wouldn't eliminate all of it. We may 
>  >need to be more proactive with recruiting someone (or some people) to 
> actually set it up.
> 
> I continue to wonder if there’s value in setting this up. Who needs 5.6 
> or 5.8, etc. so desperately that we need to maintain this stream? How do 
> we know when they don’t need it?

When I wrote that exact system it was because I wanted it for my perl 
5.6 and 5.8 CPAN testing boxes, so I could test new releases with old, 
working dependencies. That's quite a long way from a "real world" use 
case though!

More useful was that it also supported per-OS CPAN mirrors, so if you 
only wanted versions of modules that were known to work on NetBSD, for 
example, you could get that. I added that feature because an actual 
real-world user asked for it. I can see that it would be useful for 
people on things like Windows where support is a bit flakey because 
authors don't have access to it.

-- 
David Cantrell