Re: MooseX::FSA::Simple

+1

On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:19:37 -0700
Karen Etheridge <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:13:06PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> > I'd really prefer that MooseX _only_ be used for extensions to
> > Moose (at the meta level).
> 
> Strongly agree. Although this depends on the cooperation of the
> individual authors, I'd like to try approaching the owners of the
> existing modules in this namespace and encouraging them to rename.
> 
> > That said, another namespace for modules designed to work with
> > other Moose _using_ modules might be useful. No good names come to
> > mind right now, though.
> 
> IMHO the name should primarily represent what it *does*, not what it
> *uses*, so for example a role that is meant to be used in Catalyst
> should start with Catalyst::Role::, not Role::Catalyst::.
> 
> So for the original subject of this thread, I'd suggest
> FSA::Role::Rules or FSA::Role::Rules::Simple.
> 
>