Re: MooseX::FSA::Simple

On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Karen Etheridge wrote:

>> That said, another namespace for modules designed to work with other
>> Moose _using_ modules might be useful. No good names come to mind right
>> now, though.
>
> IMHO the name should primarily represent what it *does*, not what it
> *uses*, so for example a role that is meant to be used in Catalyst should
> start with Catalyst::Role::, not Role::Catalyst::.
>
> So for the original subject of this thread, I'd suggest FSA::Role::Rules or
> FSA::Role::Rules::Simple.

Good point. I agree.

I do think putting Role in the name is useful, since roles are 
fundamentally different than standalone classes. Unfortunately, there's 
multiple role systems on CPAN, so Role != Moose.


-dave

/*============================================================
http://VegGuide.org               http://blog.urth.org
Your guide to all that's veg      House Absolute(ly Pointless)
============================================================*/