Re: Replacing "use base" with "use parent"

[email protected] (Chris Prather)
Newsgroups perl.moose
Message-ID <CAEFJ169kP57+EZKU_6ar5yUqw=WPGo0i46bydu0eYiuP6kMJow@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday, October 9, 2012, Jesse Luehrs wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 01:47:52PM -0700, Karen Etheridge wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 11:14:02AM -0500, Jesse Luehrs wrote:
> > > parent is dual-life, so it wouldn't be a case of dropping support, it
> > > would just be an extra dependency for 5.8. That said, an extra
> > > dependency for no actual reason does seem a bit questionable (which is
> > > why I was asking for the reasoning).
> >
> > Have you looked at the base.pm code? It needs to die as quick a death
> as we
> > can bring it.
>
> If "ugly code" was a reason to avoid using a module, I would be
> significantly less productive in perl d:
>
>


Or maintaining significantly more forks of various modules and ideas.

-Chris
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.