Re: Replacing "use base" with "use parent"

On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 05:10:48PM -0400, Chris Prather wrote:
> Or maintaining significantly more forks of various modules and ideas.

Nothing is being forked here.  We received a patch to move from an
old-and-discouraged module to an improved version, that is dual-lifed and
has been in core since 5.10.1. I don't see any downside to accepting it,
especially since Olivier has already graciously done all the work.

Seriously, *no one* will notice a thing by this change, except those of us
who had this on their tuit list can cross it off, and Olivier can be happy
that he's improved our codebase a little bit more.