Re: CALL-ME vs. Callable

Fair points, all.

I do think, though that if the concern is really with "the 4 cases when nqp
hauls a CALL-ME out of its bowels" then that's what should be addressed...



Aaron Sherman, M.:
P: 617-440-4332 Google Talk, Email and Google Plus: [email protected]
Toolsmith, developer, gamer and life-long student.


On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Brandon Allbery <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Also...
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Aaron Sherman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Role-based testing seems very perl6ish. I'd suggest the role name be
>> "Invocable" with much the sort of signature as you've described.
>
>
> If it's Invokable then the method should probably be INVOKE. It still
> leaves the question of why Callable appears to be the only role named
> after what it applies to instead of what it provides.
>
> --
> brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine
> associates
> [email protected]
> [email protected]
> unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad
> http://sinenomine.net
>