Re: CALL-ME vs. Callable

[email protected] (Brandon Allbery) Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:08:52 -0500

Newsgroups	perl.perl6.language
Message-ID	<CAKFCL4XTJLzW05D+UUHfeOVeSBodjqACh=o-+ofkgD6hdHgY6Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Aaron Sherman <[email protected]> wrote:

> I do think, though that if the concern is really with "the 4 cases when
> nqp hauls a CALL-ME out of its bowels" then that's what should be
> addressed...
>

The main addressing of that is some kind of role to abstract it properly. I
just think the current situation is bad and even if we come up with a name
for the new role, it's still going to be confusing ("ok, why do we have
both Callable and Invokable? ...uh wait, Callable means *what* exactly?").

-- 
brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
[email protected]                                  [email protected]
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net