licensing issues (was Re: standard representations)

--iOtGqDe+slfBpY/Q
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

> On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
> 
> > I personally think that the relying on LGPL'ed code is completely
> > reasonable.  Some will disagree, so we need to come to a consensus on this
> > as a community.

Andy Dougherty <[email protected]> wrote:

> 1.  What are the consequences for those who redistribute software based on
> or including perl6?  This is a licensing issue that I do not feel
> competent to address, and hence won't.

I can likely help address these, when the time comes.

What I expected would happen would be that other working groups would make a
decision on the *technology*, roughly "ignoring" the licensing, and
referring it to to the Licensing Working Group and saying: "Ok, what are the
consequences if we use this."

There seems no point in considering hypotheticals until a technological
decision is made.

-- 
Bradley M. Kuhn  -  http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn

--iOtGqDe+slfBpY/Q
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6ViBj53XjJNtBs4cRAnjjAJ9qzFLqjIE+ui124FgAcP+XYn5NnACeJpTi
obzb7//dCRBt+NQvAOZs/4A=
=tLIh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--iOtGqDe+slfBpY/Q--