public domain? (was Re: standard representations)
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") Fri, 5 Jan 2001 14:34:09 -0500
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.internals,perl.perl6.licenses |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--TQP3ZQ+iQOTK/zFI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > At 12:29 AM 1/5/01 -0500, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote: > >Dan Sugalski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I'm beginning to loathe software licenses in a *big* way, and I'm a half > > > step away from saying to hell with it all and going fully public domain. > > > (Or at least pushing for it, as I don't control perl's licensing terms) > >Public domain has it's own troubles too. To be safe in doing a public > >domain license, we'll need to get copyright disclaimers from everyone who > >contributes code (and possibly their employers). Otherwise, someone could > >come along later and legally claim copyright on some part. Dan Sugalski <[email protected]> wrote: > No worse than what we need now. Submitting code to perl places it under the > license that perl uses, if it's to be included. I am not completely sure this is correct, but only a copyright lawyer could tell us for sure. My worry is that when you submit a patch to Perl, you've already seen and been made aware of its license it's a bit more clear that one agrees to release their software under that license. You still claim copyright, but you are at least implicitly licensing it under perl's license. Public domain is a disclaimer of copyright. It seems to me that it's much harder to infer that, by submitting a patch, someone meant to say: "I give up all copyright on this work" than it is to infer: "I am submitting this copyrighted work of mine to a project whose license I know, and therefore it's under the same license." But, this is a question for a copyright lawyer. OTOH, digital signatures are apparently now legally valid in the USA (although the details still aren't clear to me). We could just ask everyone to PGP or GPG sign a message that says: "I disclaim copyright", which isn't a hard task. -- Bradley M. Kuhn - http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn --TQP3ZQ+iQOTK/zFI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6ViGx53XjJNtBs4cRAkpvAKCfjn5oF+8wFiJFGnZgd0F1jMktXwCgjNxT L0ceaNmP7nAyLxwOqTSOh6c= =gCcY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TQP3ZQ+iQOTK/zFI--