Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's daily build and smoke test

[email protected] (Tim Bunce) Mon, 19 Feb 2001 15:45:42 +0000

Newsgroups	perl.perl6.meta,perl.qa,perl.perl5.porters
Organization	Paul Ingram Group, Software Systems, +44 1 483 862800
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 09:03:00AM -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 04:01:25PM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:49:04 -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:47:12PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote:
> > > > As an active non-smoker, I'd appreciate a different name.
> > > 
> > > Likewise.  What's wrong with builders?
> > 
> > Same here. Testers?
> 
> perl-builders?

Or to be more whimsical:

	perl-night-shift
	perl-night-build

It probably needs a name that'll both indicate its role and avoid confusion
with 'porters' (who do most of the 'building' to the untrained eye).

Tim.