Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's daily build and smoke test

At 15:45 +0000 2001.02.19, Tim Bunce wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 09:03:00AM -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 04:01:25PM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
>> > On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:49:04 -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:47:12PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote:
>> > > > As an active non-smoker, I'd appreciate a different name.
>> > >
>> > > Likewise.  What's wrong with builders?
>> >
>> > Same here. Testers?
>>
>> perl-builders?
>
>Or to be more whimsical:
>
>	perl-night-shift
>	perl-night-build
>
>It probably needs a name that'll both indicate its role and avoid confusion
>with 'porters' (who do most of the 'building' to the untrained eye).

I dunno; I dislike smoking, but I like the idea of "smoking-camels" or
something.  :)

-- 
Chris Nandor                      [email protected]    http://pudge.net/
Open Source Development Network    [email protected]     http://osdn.com/