Re: State of PDD 0

[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:30:42 -0500

Newsgroups	perl.perl6.meta
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

At 02:15 PM 2/20/2001 -0700, Nathan Torkington wrote:
>Bryan C. Warnock writes:
> > Ask, all, are we reusing perl6-rfc as the submittal address, or will there
> > be a new one (perl-pdd)?
>
>I'm in favour of renaming to reflect the new use of the list.  Dan?

I've been thinking since I sent my last mail on this that we might actually 
want to leave the two (PDD & RFC) separate. Keep on with the RFCs for 
'external' things, and PDD for the actual internals implementation of things.

					Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[email protected]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk