Re: State of PDD 0
[email protected] (Ask Bjoern Hansen) Tue, 20 Feb 2001 14:38:37 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | perl.perl6.meta |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.21.0102201437230.25502-100000@impatience.valueclick.com> |
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > > Ask, all, are we reusing perl6-rfc as the submittal address, or will there > > > be a new one (perl-pdd)? > > > >I'm in favour of renaming to reflect the new use of the list. Dan? > > I've been thinking since I sent my last mail on this that we might actually > want to leave the two (PDD & RFC) separate. Keep on with the RFCs for > 'external' things, and PDD for the actual internals implementation of things. I have created perl6-announce-pdd. Mail [email protected] for clues. How should the submission process work? As for the RFC's? - ask -- ask bjoern hansen - <http://ask.netcetera.dk/> more than 70M impressions per day, <http://valueclick.com>