Re: Assume CP1252
[email protected] (Shawn H Corey) Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:25:43 -0500
| Newsgroups | perl.pod-people |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20150112082543.4dc1ddd7@sage> |
On Sun, 11 Jan 2015 20:57:26 -0700 Karl Williamson <[email protected]> wrote: > To be clear, I think that assuming 1252 when there is no =encoding > line is a good idea. But I'm leery of overriding an actual =encoding > line. Agreed. Q: What if there is more than one =encoding line? Does it switch encoding part way thru a POD? -- Don't stop where the ink does. Shawn