Re: Assume CP1252

On 01/12/2015 06:25 AM, Shawn H Corey wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jan 2015 20:57:26 -0700
> Karl Williamson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> To be clear, I think that assuming 1252 when there is no =encoding
>> line is a good idea.  But I'm leery of overriding an actual =encoding
>> line.
>
> Agreed.

I could possibly be persuaded, if someone want to make it, by the 
argument that 'latin1' is kind of colloquial, and someone using it may 
very well not be familiar with the possibility that they really mean 
cp1252.  But, if so, there needs to be a way for someone to say "I 
really mean it" and not be overridden by us.  Perhaps
that could be =encoding "ISO-8859-1".

>
> Q: What if there is more than one =encoding line? Does it switch
> encoding part way thru a POD?
>
>

Error while formatting with Pod::Perldoc::ToMan:
  Nested processed encoding. at 
/usr/share/perl/5.18/Pod/Simple/BlackBox.pm line 380.