Subversion

[email protected] (Arthur Bergman)
Newsgroups perl.ponie.dev
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

I think I can conclude my attempt to use subversion as
	   ____   __     __  _   _     ____    _   _    ____   _  __  ____
  / ___|  \ \   / / | \ | |   / ___|  | | | |  / ___| | |/ / / ___|
  \___ \   \ \ / /  |  \| |   \___ \  | | | | | |     | ' /  \___ \
   ___) |   \ V /   | |\  |    ___) | | |_| | | |___  | . \   ___) |
  |____/     \_/    |_| \_|   |____/   \___/   \____| |_|\_\ |____/

(SUBVERSION SUCKS)

First of all, checking out parrot using subversion takes at least 4 
time slonger than CVS

Doing a vendor checkin brining up parrot to latest version is a major 
pain the arse. The process alone of running svn_load_dirs takes around 
an hour, and then I have to tag it (because if you tell svn_load_dirs 
to tag things automatically it breaks). It also seems not to have 
changed some stuff when other stuff has changed! 
(http://svn.perl.org/ponie/vendor/parrot/current/config/auto/gcc.pl is 
one file that should have been updated).

Committing two files took 1 minute 22 second yesterday, a checkout is 
extremely painfully slow. I am very close to saying it is a failed 
experiment and either go to p4 or cvs for the time being.

A very angry Arthur who has spent far too much time battling an 
substandard versioning system. (which might be theoretically very nice, 
but does not scale)


ps. And off I go to try and do another merge of parrot!
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.