Re: anyone want to adopt Test::Tester?
[email protected] (Ricardo Signes) Thu, 26 Jun 2014 18:18:35 -0400
| Newsgroups | perl.qa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* David Cantrell <[email protected]> [2014-06-26T09:19:00] > I understand that Test::Builder::Tester is the way to go these days - > and it's distributed with Test::Builder, so incompatibilities should > never* happen. Test::Tester is really nice and easy to use. Test::Builder::Tester is awful and often requires that you predict the exact TAP that will be printed. I always recommend Test::Tester. Fergal, if no one replies, I can take over simply to shepherd patches and make releases. -- rjbs
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 473 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTrJw7AAoJEOYby6cMccU5xt4IAIBgQ9IRNbEdbDP/4Zz8wGMm Ebqd8f7LaJ39h8cZNMFz3mI5/IxTQ06wy8XcilNuGDgMVOgZy8S2uGGwNMjDy0Q3 hgojaTbk6KMKzVt8vumUNZQYFuu5WRi+oFDYjxZ2pFoDVEoOcBUtTEvcHdXQp+Nm oYUOz03YF5cfAF3AtOLt0GW7hBRmiWUgXDJic0Jk+DSJnUcauHxy3Fx3OPtQagLQ 6XQ506/lqcWBg9HfiGfURXj6Z4/PVeBntdvKdNkIbEaAMaNxwYXhcKHtshA7c+h7 yY3b6+xJw01CAbXgCaWpZlbM3N3vu+pQsamDWP0o8w8Ob/JrlRnbsSXBsn+YN4w= =zWEz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----