Re: anyone want to adopt Test::Tester?

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 06:18:35PM -0400, Ricardo Signes wrote:
> * David Cantrell <[email protected]> [2014-06-26T09:19:00]
> > I understand that Test::Builder::Tester is the way to go these days -
> > and it's distributed with Test::Builder, so incompatibilities should
> > never* happen.
> 
> Test::Tester is really nice and easy to use.
> 
> Test::Builder::Tester is awful and often requires that you predict the exact
> TAP that will be printed.
> 
> I always recommend Test::Tester.

Indeed. I just did a search of all my Test::* modules, and they all use
Test::Tester, not Test::Builder::Tester.

> Fergal, if no one replies, I can take over simply to shepherd patches and make
> releases.

me too. I may even do more, but I'm not making any promises yet :)