Re: Legacy scripts
[email protected] (Rich Bowen)
| Newsgroups | perl.scripts |
|---|---|
| Organization | RCBowen.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Simply Hao wrote: > > My first post didn't make it, so I guess this is a good time to try > again. :) > > > The modules section of CPAN isn't peer reviewed either, everyone > > http://tpi.perl.org/cpan-testers/results.cgi But those that don't pass those tests are not thrown out of the archive, which is an important distinction. > Does anyone think we should have scripts equivalent of CPAN testers? I do. I think that would be a great idea, assuming that we did it in a similar way that the CPAN testers have done. They've done some good stuff, and we should learn from the work that they have done. Rich -- Rich Bowen - [email protected] Lexington Perl Mongers - http://lexington.pm.org/